IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIJUMON C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed concerning land orders (Para 2) |
| 2. findings from advocate commissioner report (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal compliance and jurisdiction issues (Para 6) |
| 4. rs consideration of legal authority and jurisdiction (Para 7) |
| 5. final decision of the court (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i. “issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the operation and all further proceedings in pursuance to Exts.P8 and P10 orders of the 4th respondent;
ii. issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that Ext-P5 proceeding of the 4th respondent was strictly in accordance with law and hence legally sustainable;
iii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext-P11 petition, with notice to the petitioner, in the light of Exts-P5, P6 and P7, forthwith;
iv. issue such other writ, order or direction which may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case;
v. dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the Vernacular Language.” [sic]
2. According to the petitioner, he secured ownership and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.