IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
V.J. JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
1 P. SUDHAKARAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and details surrounding the injunction. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's analysis and direction for expedited final orders. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by an ad-interim order of injunction passed as per Ext.P3 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.296 of 2025 by the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner seeks a direction for final disposal of the I.A. on merits.
2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 1st respondent stating that the ad-interim injunction was ordered after giving sufficient time for the petitioner to file their objections. Be that as it may, final orders need to be issued on the application.
In the above circumstances, this original petition is disposed of, directing the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram, to consider and pass final orders on I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.296 of 2025 on merits after hearing the parties at the earliest, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.