SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10397

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
V.J. JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
1 P. SUDHAKARAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 397 OF 2026



Important Points

Court emphasizes timely proceedings in injunction matters to ensure justice.

Subject

Civil - Injunction

Headnote

The judgment addresses the ad-interim injunction passed against the petitioner in the ongoing case concerning an application for final disposal. The court found that the injunction was granted after the petitioner was provided adequate opportunity to respond, and thus directed the lower court to expedite hearings on the matter. The court emphasized the need for final orders post hearing within a month. The order reaffirms the importance of expediting judicial processes.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR, SMT.A.DEEPTHI, SMT.CLARA SHERIN FRANCIS, SHRI.VYSHNAV S.
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.N.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA), SHRI.G.ARUN, SRI.G.VARUN

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and details surrounding the injunction. (Para 1)
2. court's analysis and direction for expedited final orders. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by an ad-interim order of injunction passed as per Ext.P3 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.296 of 2025 by the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner seeks a direction for final disposal of the I.A. on merits.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 1st respondent stating that the ad-interim injunction was ordered after giving sufficient time for the petitioner to file their objections. Be that as it may, final orders need to be issued on the application.

In the above circumstances, this original petition is disposed of, directing the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram, to consider and pass final orders on I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.296 of 2025 on merits after hearing the parties at the earliest, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top