Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10462
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
VIDHYADHARAN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48051 OF 2025
Important Points
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.J.OM PRAKASH, SRI.C.X.ANTONY BENEDICT, SHRI.MAJEED V.P., SHRI.EMMANUAL SANJU
For the Respondents: ADV. SHAMEER P M -GP
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for mandamus. (Para 1) |
| 2. hearing currently ongoing in tribunal. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs timely resolution from tribunal. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
“1. To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the Ext.P4 Representation with notice to the 3rd respondent at the earliest within a time schedule to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.”
2. When the writ petition came up for consideration today, the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that file No. RDO Alp/55/2026 had been forwarded by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent – Maintenance Tribunal, and notices were issued to all parties and hearing is going on.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that the matter is being considered by the second respondent and it is posted to 13.02.2026. Since the prayer in the writ petition is for speedy disposal of the matter by the 2nd respondent, considering the submissions made by both sides, I find it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petition pending before the 2nd respondent in a time bound manner.
Accordingly, the 2nd respondent is directed to dispose of the file relating to the petitioner herein within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
