Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
V O RESHMA – Appellant
Versus
MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35937 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.RAJENDRAN, SMT.R.S.SREEVIDYA
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.ASHLEY JOHN, SMT.RANJANA V., SMT.ANUSREE C.S.

Withdrawal of a petition allows the petitioner to approach an appropriate forum subsequently.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Findings: The Court has determined the request as valid.

Issues: The primary question was the withdrawal of the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the liberal approach towards withdrawals, allowing the petitioner to seek an alternative remedy.

Result: This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JV O RESHMA – AppellantVersusMANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35937 OF 2024

Withdrawal of a petition allows the petitioner to approach an appropriate forum subsequently.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
V O RESHMA – Appellant
Versus
MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35937 OF 2024