Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
NEERAJ.M. – Appellant
Versus
SURANYA K.MOHAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks postponement of trial. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. responses to previous petitions determine outcomes. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court denies intervention in trial procedures. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioner seeks that the learned Family Court, Wayanad, be directed to ‘postpone’ the trial in O.P. (D)No.638/2022, O.P.No.155/2023 and M.C.No.61/2023 for a month; or till a decision is taken by this Court in Tr.P(C)No.66/2026.
2. To understand the facts clearly, we record that O.P. (D)No.638/2022, O.P.No.155/2023 and M.C.No.61/2023 were, admittedly, filed before the learned Family Court, Wayanad, by the respondent – wife seeking divorce, return of her patrimony and maintenance respectively; and while they were pending, it transpires that the petitioner filed O.P.No.2106/2025 before the learned Family Court, Kozhikode, seeking restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent.
3. The respondent, thereupon, filed Tr.P(C)No.66/2026 before this Court, seeking that the above mentioned O.P.No.2106/2025 be transferred from the learned Family Court, Kozhikode to that of Wayanad; and a learned Judge of this Court has issued Ext.P4 order of stay of further
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
