Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
SREEKALA C.N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges disapproval of appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. initial approvals and claims discussed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. amendments impacting eligibility examined. (Para 6) |
| 4. legal requirements for rule 51a reviewed. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court directs approval and salary disbursement. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P9 order of the 2nd respondent declining approval to the appointment of the petitioner in the post of Part Time Hindi Teacher and Ext.P10 consequential order of the 5th respondent directing the Manager of the 6th respondent to remove the petitioner from the attendance rolls of the School.
2. The petitioner states that she was initially appointed as Hindi Teacher in a leave vacancy from 09.08.2000 to 21.12.2000 by the Manager of the 6th respondent-School. The said appointment was approved as per Ext.P1. The petitioner therefore staked a Rule 51A claim based on Ext.P1 appointment order.
3. Thereafter, treating the petitioner as a Rule 51A claimant, the Manager appointed the petitioner to the post of Part Time Junior Hindi Teacher on 15.07.2021 as per Ext.P3 or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
