Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAJESH VISWAMBHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for witness statements and documents. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. argument for compliance with documentation provisions. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's direction to comply with rule 19(4). (Para 4) |
K.BABU, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P (Crl) No.207 of 2026 ---------------------------------------
Dated this the 11thday of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The prayers in this Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:
“i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to provide the list of statement of witnesses recorded during investigation in Crime No.909/2014 of Pettah PS Thiruvananthapuram, both relied on and un-relied by the prosecution in terms of Rule 19(4) of the Criminal Rules of Practice Kerala.
ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to provide the list of documents which are part of investigation in Crime No No.909/2014 of Pettah PS Thiruvananthapuram, both relied on and un-relied by the prosecution in terms of Rule 19(4) of the Criminal Rules of Practice Kerala.
iii. To direc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
