Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11040
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M.D. GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
P.A. SAINUDEEN @ ALIKOYA – Respondent
RFA NO. 473 OF 2003 (F)
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.), SRI. K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.), SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
For the Respondents: SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.), SRI. K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.), SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
For the Respondents: SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
The court recognizes and enforces amicable settlements reached by the parties, leading to the disposal of appeals and closure of related applications.
Headnote:In this case, the court examined the regular first appeal concerning the amicable settlement made between the parties. The appellant's counsel filed a memo indicating a compromise petition in an adjoining case, demonstrating the parties' resolution of their disputes. The court acknowledged this settlement and subsequently disposed of the appeal, closing any pending interlocutory applications.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and a compromise petition is filed in A.S No.466 of 2001 tagged along with the appeal. In the light of the memo, the appeal is disposed of. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-
