Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11041
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
P.A.ZAINUDHEEN @ ALIKOYA – Appellant
Versus
M.D. GEORGE – Respondent
RFA NO. 474 OF 2003 (F)
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
For the Respondents: SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.), SRI. K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
For the Respondents: SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.), SRI. K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
Dispute settled amicably between parties, leading to dismissal of appeal.
Headnote:The appeal arises from a civil matter where the parties reached an amicable settlement, leading to the appellants filing a memo with a compromise petition. The court acknowledges this resolution and orders the appeal to be disposed of. The matter is resolved without further proceedings, with all pending applications closed.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and a compromise petition is filed in A.S No.466 of 2001 tagged along with the appeal. In the light of the memo, the appeal is disposed of. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-
