SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ROOPESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13404 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.702/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ, SRI.R.PRATHEESH (ARANMULA), SMT.E.S.SONI, SHRI.ARUN RAJ
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Pre-arrest bail granted due to insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime, ensuring cooperation with investigations.

Headnote:Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, permits pre-arrest bail applications. The applicant, facing charges in Crime No.702/2025, was accused of posting provocative comments online. The court found no substantial evidence linking him to the crime, thus the application for bail was granted. The primary issues addressed were the necessity of custodial interrogation and evidential links to the accusations. The court reasoned that the applicant's prior deletion of the comment and absence of criminal antecedents justified granting bail. The application is allowed on specified conditions, ensuring cooperation with ongoing investigations.

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.702/2025 of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 192 and 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 24.03.2025, while the police was conducting social media patrolling, it was found that the applicant posted a provocative comment from his facebook ID, which could cause a riot in the society and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Krishna Raj, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicant has sworn in an affidavit stating that the when the Police contacted him and informed about the criminal nature of the comment, he deleted the comment and subsequently, he deleted his facebook account itself on 07.04.2025. In the circumstances, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. Moreover, the applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top