SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11128

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
VELUTHAI ASHOKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14008 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.CHANDY JOSEPH, SRI.C.K.VIDYASAGAR
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Court granted pre-arrest bail based on lack of criminal antecedents and absence of overt acts attributed to the accused.

Headnote:The application is made under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for pre-arrest bail in Crime No.996/2025. The applicant, a mother aged 51, argues innocence, while the prosecution alleges intentional criminal acts. The court notes no overt act attributed to the applicant and lacks criminal antecedents. It grants bail determining custodial interrogation unnecessary. The result allows bail under specified conditions.

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.3 in Crime No.996/2025 of Kumaly Police Station, Idukki District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 296 (b), 74, 126(2) and 115(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 01.10.2025 at 5.30 p.m., the applicant and the remaining accused assaulted the defacto complainant, also outraged her modesty and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.P.Chandy Joseph, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, she is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if she is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicant is a lady aged 51 years. She is the mother of the accused No.1 and wife of the accused No.2. Accused Nos.1 and 2 were already arrested. No specific overt act has been alleged against the applicant. The main allegations are against accused Nos.1 and 2. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, her custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of her arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting herself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. She shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top