IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
K. L PADMANABHA PAI – Appellant
Versus
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6027 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of land acquisition and compensation dissatisfaction. (Para 1) |
| 2. court directs timely action on compensation re-evaluation. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
A portion of the petitioner’s land having an extent of 20.61 ares has been acquired by the 1st respondent National Highway Authority of India. An award was passed vide Ext.P1. In respect of another portion of land acquired, an award was passed vide Ext.P3. Dissatisfied with the compensation amount vide Exts.P1 and P3, the petitioner preferred Exts.P2 and P4 applications for re- determination of the compensation under Section 3G (5), (6) and (7) of the National Highways Act . The same is pending, without any action, for the past fifteen months, is the short grievance.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders in Exts.P2 and P4 applications, preferred by the petitioner seeking re-determination of compensation, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Needless to say, that the petitioner, as also, any other affected party shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard before taking a call in Exts.P2 and P4.
This Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.