SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11275

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DIPAK DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 11289 OF 2023 | CRIME NO.239/2023 | SC NO.1051 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI, SHRI.MUHAMMED RIFA P.M., SHRI.VISHNU V. NAIR, SMT.NAZRIYA NOUSHAD
For the Respondents: SRI. BREEZ.M.S, SR. PP, SMT.SAJNA T.UMMER

A court can quash criminal proceedings when the victim marries the accused, promoting justice and family harmony.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.PC to quash proceedings based on a settlement of the dispute following the marriage of the petitioner to the victim. The court examined existing precedents, concluding that continued criminal proceedings in such contexts could obstruct justice and family harmony. The court highlighted that allowing the proceedings to continue would serve no constructive purpose and would burden the judicial system needlessly.

Result: The court allowed the petition to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. details of the case and allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on the settlement and marriage. (Para 3)
3. court's reasoning and conclusions on quashing. (Para 4 , 7 , 9)
4. affidavit from the victim indicating her stance. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

Dated this the 17th day of February, 2026 The accused in S.C.No.1051 of 2023 on the file of the Fast Track Special Court, Perumbavoor, arising out of Crime No.239 of 2023 of Kuruppanpady Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 482 of the Cr.PC, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 3 76 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 (a) r/w 4(l), 4(2), 5(l), 5(j)(ii) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (PoCSO Act, in short).

2. The prosecution case is that the accused, with the intention to satisfy his sexual lust, committed rape upon the defacto complainant, aged 15 years, repeatedly during the period from June, 2022 and as a result of which, she became pregnant and gave birth to a child on 19.04.2023, and thereby he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.

3. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant has been settled and the petitioner already married the defacto complainant and now they are living together as husband and wife along with their child. Therefore, the learned Counsel prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.

4. The question whether a crime of aggravated penetrative sexual assault registered under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act could be quashed taking note of the fact that the victim was married by the accused was considered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in the decision in xxxx v. State of Kerala , 2025 (4) KHC 471. After relying upon various decisions of the Apex Court and High Courts, the learned Judge has culled out seven significant aspects to be looked into. In paragraph No.26 of the above decision, the learned Judge held as follows:

(1) Unless the criminal proceedings are terminated by quashing the same, there will be utter chaos, confusion and even havoc in the life of the victim who married the accused, and who is leading a happy life. In other words, the life of the victim, the accused and the child, if any, in that relationship will be ruined. Per contra, If the offence is quashed, it will bring in harmony, peace and happiness, thus promoting their family life.

(2) Unless, the Court choose to quash the proceedings, the trauma/agony of the child/victim continues, despite a genuine and bonafide settlement.

(3) Despite and de-hors a bonafide and genuine settlement culminating in the marriage between the petitioner/accused and the victim, if the criminal proceedings are to continue - thereby compelling the parties to face the trial - the same verge upon abuse of process.

(4) The ends of justice is in favour of quashment in such category of cases, since it will be an injustice to separate a well knit family by the continuance of the proceedings.

(5) Quashment of the proceedings will result in rendering total and complete justice to the parties.

(6) When the crucial witness is the victim, who had married the accused, there exists little chance for her to speak against her own husband/ accused, wherefore, the chances of conviction will be too bleak and remote : 2025:KER:52904 In other words, no fruitful purpose will be served by continuance of the proceedings.

(7) Compelling the continuance of a proceedings, which is otherwise settled genuinely and which answers the requirements of the interest of justice will only add to the burden of criminal courts in India, which is otherwise over burdened.

5. The petitioner has also produced the copy of the certificate of marriage, issued by the Marriage OfÏcer, Dhemaji, Assam, which shows that the petitioner married the defacto comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top