SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11318

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BENNY JOHN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11590 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.DEVAN
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVI SHRI R., SRI. P.K. SAJEEV

The amendment to Section 207 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act does not discriminate against private educational institutions in property tax exemption eligibility.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of the amendment to Section 207 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act by Act 31 of 2009. The basis of the writ petition was the claim of discrimination regarding property tax exemption for the petitioner's educational institutions compared to government institutions. Previous judgments confirmed this position against the petitioner. The Court concluded that nothing further needed to be considered and dismissed the writ petition.

Table of Content
1. challenge to the amendment of property tax exemption. (Para 1 , 2)
2. precedents against the petitioner. (Para 3)
3. no further consideration needed. (Para 4)
4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges the amendment brought to Section 207 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act , by substituting the same by Act 31 of 2009 with effect from 07.10.2009, as unconstitutional.

2. The writ petition proceeds on the basis that the petitioner's Engineering College and Institute of Management Studies were discriminated from those educational institutions owned by the Government or functioning with the financial assistance of the Government in the matter of eligibility for exemption from paying the property tax.

3. Both sides submit that the issue is covered against the petitioner by the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8925 of 2012 and by the judgment of this Court in Manager, Vimal Jyothi Engineering College and Others v. State of Kerala and Others [ 2019 (5) KHC 641 ]

4. In view of the above, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition.

5. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there was an interim order in force from 08.04.2015, the respondents could not recover the amounts due from the petitioner.

6. It is made clear that the period from 07.04.2015 till this date shall be excluded for computing the period of limitation for the

2nd respondent to make a demand against the petitioner.

Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top