2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11349
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.J PAUL – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6093 OF 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.C.K.SHERIN, SMT.BLESSY MARY SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE
The court has the discretion to direct timely consideration of administrative applications under specific statutes.
Headnote:Under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for the timely consideration of an application. The court directs the respondents to submit necessary reports and expedite the process. The court orders that the application be considered within five months based on the submitted report. The writ petition is disposed of with specific directions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writ petition (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's request for expedited processing (Para 2) |
| 3. court hears both parties (Para 3) |
| 4. court's decision to expedite consideration (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 application in Form No. 7 as expeditiously as possible by granting permission to use the land for any other purposes.
b) Direct the 3rd respondent to re assess the land tax and make additional entries in the BTR u/s 27 C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wet Land Act after obtaining order in Form 7 application.
c) Dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
d) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 7 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised OfÏcer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from respondents 4 and 5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before respondents 2, 4 and 5 for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE GBG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 6093 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit -P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of Judgment
17.02.2026
Judgment dictated
17.02.2026
Draft Judgment placed
18.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded
19.02.2026
21.05.2025 FOR THE PERIOD 2025-2026 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE; ALANGADU