Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
BINOY JOSE VILLA, RAJESH S/O.THANKAPPAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners convicted under ipc for robbery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. lower courts' findings confirmed on appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding evidence credibility addressed. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The concurrent verdicts of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Karunagappally, and the Additional Sessions Judge - II, Kollam, in C.C.No.696 of 2004 and in Crl.A.No.632 of 2006 respectively, convicting and sentencing the petitioners for the commission of the offence under Section 394 IPC read with Section
34 IPC , are under challenge in this revision.
2. The prosecution case is that on 06.12.2003, at about
5.00 pm, the petitioners committed robbery by snatching the gold chain worn by PW1 after hitting upon her neck, while she was walking through the road situated near Thazhava South Muri. It was alleged that the 1st accused drove a Motor Bike with the 2nd accused as pillion rider, and all of a sudden, attacked PW1 and snatched the gold chain which she had been wearing.
3. The case came to light with the confession made by the accused to the Sub Inspector of Police, Mannar, while being questioned in Crime No.57 of 2004 of the Mannar Police Station. Accordingly, Crime No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
