SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
RANJISHA B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34617 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO. 35144 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM
For the Respondents: SMT. SONY K.B

Employees appointed to posts must be granted pay approval from the date their institution meets economic criteria, irrespective of prior reservations.

Headnote:The petitioners, employees at a government school, sought approval of their appointments on a certain pay scale from the date their school became economic. The court noted the application of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and concluded that the petitioners were entitled to the approval of their pay scale from 01.06.2024, with consequential benefits disbursed within three months.

Table of Content
1. petitioners work in an economic school. (Para 1)
2. counsel heard for both parties. (Para 2)
3. disagreement over provisions of disability act. (Para 3)
4. uncontested status of school as economic. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of February, 2026 [WP(C) Nos.34617 & 35144 of 2025]

The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.34617/2025 is working as LPST in the Gurukulam L.P School, Kannur. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.35144/2025 is working as Arabic Teacher in the same School. The petitioners have filed these writ petitions seeking to direct the 4th respondent to provisionally approve the appointment of the petitioners in Scale of Pay from 01.06.2024 onwards, which is the day on which the School became economic and to disburse all consequential benefits.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1 to 4.

3. It is evident from the pleadings that when the petitioners were appointed to their respective posts, the School was uneconomic. The petitioners made requests for approval of appointment on Scale of Pay, but it was rejected by the respondents saying that the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act , 2016 would apply to the case of the petitioners and therefore, the requests for approval on Scale of Pay cannot be considered.

4. It is the case of the petitioners that the reservation for PwD candidate will not apply to the case of the petitioners. The School has subsequently become economic and this factor is not disputed. In such circumstances, the petitioners are entitled to approval on Scale of Pay basis with effect from the date on which the School has become economic. In this case, the School became economic on and from 01.06.2024.

In the afore circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the 4th respondent to provisionally approve the appointments of the petitioners in their respective posts in the applicable Scale of Pay from 01.06.2024 onwards and to disburse consequential benefits to the petitioners. Consequential benefits shall be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top