Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11483
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANSAR ABDU RAHIMAN PALLIYALIL – Appellant
Versus
JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 16782 OF 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA, SMT.DEEPA V,GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN, SRI.T.M.KHALID, SMT.K.P.SUSMITHA, SMT.DEEPA V,GP
A writ petition may be dismissed for default if no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner.
Headnote:The writ petition was brought forth by the petitioner against multiple respondents regarding regional transport issues. The petitioner's counsel has withdrawn representation, prompting the court to decide on its dismissal for default. The court underscored the procedural requirement of representation and consequently dismissed the writ petition.
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that, he had relinquished the Vakalat for the petitioner. There is no representation for the petitioner also. Therefore, this writ petition need not be retained here.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
