Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SHYAMDEV K S – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. deficiency in attendance due to health issues. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's consideration in legal argument. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observation regarding precedents. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. final directive for timely decision. (Para 5) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has joined for the ITI-Turner post with the 3rd respondent herein during 2021-23. The petitioner did not have the required attendance with respect to the academic year 2021-23 since he was suffering from some ailments as evident from the medical certificates at Ext.P2 series. Therefore, the petitioner was not permitted to appear in the examination pursuant to Ext.P6 hall ticket for want of attendance. It is in such circumstances that the petitioner has filed the afore captioned writ petition seeking for a direction to condone the deficiency in attendance.
2. I have heard Sri.Sherry J.Thomas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.N.B.Sunil Nath, learned Government Pleader and Sri.Vinu, learned Central Government Counsel representing the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for additional 4th respondent.
3. It is not in dispute that the required attendance for writing the examination was 80%. Admittedly, the petitioner on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
