Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
SWAPNA.R – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion denial based on seniority lists. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge to the legality of promotion denial. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. order for timely consideration of revision petitions. (Para 6) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 13th day of February, 2026 The petitioner entered service in the School as HSA (Malayalam) from 01.06.2011. Being qualified, the petitioner was granted promotion as HM from 01.06.2025. Its approval was, however, declined by the DEO. Appeal was moved before the 2nd respondent. The DDE however rejected Ext.P4.
2. Ordinarily, Ext.P5 is to be assailed by the Manager through Samanwaya. But, it is not certain whether it would be taken up in revision appeal on time. Hence, the petitioner moved the Government with revision petition dated 05.02.2026. It is maintainable as per Ext.P6(a) judgment. Approval to the promotion of the petitioner as HM is declined both by the DEO as well as DDE on the specious plea of want of approved seniority list.
3. The petitioner submits that the petitioner is duly qualified for the post of High School HM. There are no other qualified senior hands under the Management for the HM post. Necessary declaration in that behalf is furnis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
