Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11659
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
JUGAL KISHORE KHANDELWAL(DIED) – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
AS NO. 203 OF 2001-E
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
For the Respondents: T.JAYAN,SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
For the Respondents: T.JAYAN,SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Failure to provide instructions from appellants leads to dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution.
Headnote:The Court examined the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10.10.2000 in OS NO.70 OF 1998. The appellants stated that there were no instructions to proceed, leading to the dismissal for non-prosecution. The court determined that sufficient grounds were not presented to warrant continuation. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that there is no instruction from the appellants and the appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
