Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
V.SUJINIVAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grievances over recovery of amounts from retired teachers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention on teachers' responsibilities related to admissions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court heard counsel regarding the appeals. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. no role of teachers in admissions under existing regulations. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's ruling on legality of recovery orders. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 [W.P.(C) Nos.26759, 27288 and 27340 of 2020 and
39980 of 2025]
The petitioners in all these writ petitions are Teachers who had rendered service in Aided Schools and were subsequently retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation. The grievance of the petitioners is that orders have been passed directing to recover amount from their salary / terminal benefits on the ground that the authorities have fixed liabilities on them.
2. The petitioners would contend that the liability has been fixed on the petitioners due to objections regarding the alleged bogus admission in the classes during relevant years. It was alleged that bogus admissions had resulted in financial loss to the Government.
3. The petitioners submit that the recovery cannot be effected from the sala
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
