Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ALIYAMMA PHILIPOSE @ ALIYAMMA THANCKACHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of appeal rejection due to filing delays. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. consideration of arguments and prior court directions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive for reconsideration based on case law. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing Exhibit P5 order passed by the first respondent.
b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the first respondent, Tribunal to take back Exhibit P4 appeal on file and dispose of the same on merits, in accordance with the liberty granted by this Hon’ble Court in Exhibit P2 judgment.
c. Issue such other relief order as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.
d. Dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents. "
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P5 order by which the Tribunal for Local Self-Government Institutions (‘the Tribunal’ for short) rejected an appeal filed by the petitioner because there was a delay in filing the appeal.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Stand
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
