SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ROHITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JERRY MATHEW, SMT.DEVIKA K.R., SMT.SANTRA ANIX KALLUZHATHIL
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SRI.C.K. SURESH, SPL. PP

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh one after the filing of the final report. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top