Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11732

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHINE V. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 879 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BABU S. NAIR
For the Respondents: SMT.V.SREEJA, SR. PP

Anticipatory bail application was deemed appropriate due to the bailable nature of the alleged offences under BNSS.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeking anticipatory bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged offences are bailable. The court found that anticipatory bail is warranted and closed the application.

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

Smt.V.Sreeja, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on instructions submits that the offences alleged against the applicant is only bailable in nature. Hence, the anticipatory bail application is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11732

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JSHINE V. RAJ – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 879 OF 2026

Anticipatory bail application was deemed appropriate due to the bailable nature of the alleged offences under BNSS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHINE V. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 879 OF 2026