SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11735

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
GANGADHARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 915 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.23/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN, SRI.T.R.TARIN, SMT.JYOTHY KRISHNA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Age and health can influence bail decisions even in serious accusations.

Headnote:This application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for regular bail concerning an accusation of sexual harassment. The applicant, aged 70, was alleged to have committed the offense against an 11-year-old minor. The court found that although the allegations were serious, the applicant's age and health warranted bail, allowing release under specified conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation. The applicant was granted bail, provided he complied with conditions set forth by the court.

Table of Content
1. allegations concern serious offenses against a minor. (Para 2)
2. court assesses age and health in granting bail. (Para 4 , 6)
3. arguments on innocence and implications presented. (Para 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.23/2026 of Ahdur Police Station, Kasaragod District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 75 (1)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 and Section 9 (m) read with Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , 2012.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

14.01.2026 at 15:20 hours, the applicant committed sexual harassment on the minor victim girl aged 11 years, a 6th standard student of GVHSS, Karadukka, by holding her private parts, when she visited his house for urinating while returning from school and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.T.G.Rajendran, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant is aged 70 years and is suffering from various diseases. The victim girl is aged 11 years. It is true that the allegations in the FI Statement prima-facie attract the offences. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 14.01.2026. However, considering the age of the applicant and his health condition, I am of the view that his further detention is not necessary. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

APA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top