SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SUNDARA BHARATHI D – Appellant
Versus
NEETHU SASIKUMAR – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 124 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.V.V.Nandagopal Nambiar, Smt.Preeja. P.Vijayan, Smt.Smitha (Ezhupunna), Kum.Pavan Rose Johnson

The Court directed the Family Court to dispose of pending applications expeditiously, without imposing a strict timeframe, underscoring judicial efficiency.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to Original Petition (Family Court) requesting directions for the Family Court to resolve pending applications P3 and P4. The main judgment concluded without establishing a strict timeframe but directed the Court to consider and decide on the applications promptly. The key issue revolved around the timing for the disposal of pending applications before the Family Court. The Court emphasized the necessity of expediency in resolving the applications while not setting a rigid timeline beyond two months.

Table of Content
1. sole prayer for the family court to address pending applications. (Para 2)
2. court's observation on timely decision without strict timeframe. (Para 3)
3. closure of original petition with directive for prompt disposal. (Para 4)

Devan Ramachandran, J.

Sri.V.V.Nandagopal Nambiar – appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the Original Petition before the learned Family Court - in which Exts.P3 and P4 applications filed by his client are pending – is listed on 21.02.2026 for consideration.

2. We notice that the sole prayer in this Original Petition is that the learned Family Court, Aluva, be directed to take up Exts.P3 and P4 applications and dispose it of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

3. We do not propose to fix a time frame because, when the applications are, admittedly, listed on 21.02.2026, we see no reason why the learned Court will not take it up and decide it as per law.

4. In the afore circumstances, we close this Original Petition; however, directing the learned Family Court to dispose of Exts.P3 and P4 applications at the earliest, but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top