SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11758

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
T.K.MOHAMMEDD NAFEER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.P.SAJID
For the Respondents: SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C., leaving open the option to raise all challenges before the Trial Court. It is further submitted that the second petitioner is an age old person, and that the speedy disposal of the case is highly necessary, since it would be difficult for the second petitioner to appear before the Trial Court for prolonged period in his old age.

In the light of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Crl.M.C. is closed as withdrawn. The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kannur, shall dispose of C.C.No.1069/2017 as expeditiously as possible. It is further directed that the personal appearance of the second petitioner shall not be insisted, except for those occasions where his presence is inevitable for the further progress of the trial.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top