IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
B. SREEDEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The 7th respondent is the Manager of three Schools, the Koorikuzhi AMUP School, the Aided Upper Primary School, Pallikkal and the Janakeeya Vidyalayam, Machadu. The petitioner is working as UPSA in AUPS, Pallikkal. The petitioner seeks to set aside Exts.P3 and P7 to P9 and to declare that the petitioner is entitled to get appointment covered by Ext.P2 approval.
2. The petitioner was appointed as UPSA on
02.06.2014 in AMUP School, Koorikuzhi, as per Ext.P1. The petitioner was appointed against an anticipated post of UPSA on granting independent charge to the Headmaster. For want of established post, the appointment as per Ext.P1 was not approved.
3. While continuing in the said post, the petitioner was again appointed as UPSA in Koorikuzhi AMUP School with effect from 01.06.2016 against a transfer vacancy, as per Ext.P2. The AEO rejected approval to Ext.P2 appointment as per Ext.P3 noting certain defects. The Manager moved a revision petition before the Director which revision petition was rejected as per Ext.P4 order dated 03.03.2020 of the Additional Director General of Education (Academic).
4. The petitioner states that she was appointed against a t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.