Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
BEENA M.G., BASIL JAMES, MADHUSUDHANAN S., SURESH BABU V.R., SIVASANKARA MARAR A.C. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners accused stagnation and sought acp benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents contest eligibility citing time barring and prior promotions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court confirms tribunal's dismissal due to time limitation and prior earnings. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
1. The present Original Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 10.07.2023 passed in OA No.180/00031/2019 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, whereby the claim of the petitioners for a direction that the benefits of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) and Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) be released to them was dismissed by the learned Tribunal.
Facts:-
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners have been working in the Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory (NPOL) under the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) for several years. Since no promotion was granted to them for more than 12 years, they were entitled for promotion under the ACP Scheme. The petitioners approached the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing the Original Application, in which
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
