IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
BABY. M.T. – Respondent
JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule I read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking review of the judgment dated 12.12.2025 passed in WA No.2753/2025 whereby the Writ Appeal has been dismissed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the 1st respondent/complainant’s vehicle was detained by the Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd, ie, the 2nd respondent herein. In order to get the vehicle released, he was compelled to pay the amount as claimed, ie, Rs.68,437/-. The 1st respondent approached the appellant seeking re-imbursement of the said amount as the vehicle was covered with an insurance package policy covering the third party risk including property damage etc. Since there was no re-imbursement from the appellant, the 1st respondent submitted a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam in CC No.580/2023. The issue with regard to jurisdiction of the District Commission was raised on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to consider the disputes which come under the scope of Section 126 of the Electricity Act of 2003. The District Forum, after hearing the parties conce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.