SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11777

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
KASARAGOD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE RUBBER MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.NO.C 325 – Appellant
Versus
SREEJA K.K. – Respondent
WA NO. 398 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO.2001 OF 2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.T.K. Vipindas
For the Respondents: Sri Kaleeswaram Raj, Sri Sunil Kumar Kuriakose GP

An appeal is deemed infructuous and can be dismissed if it is no longer viable.

Headnote:In the context of a writ appeal, the Court analyzed the submissions regarding the case's status and determined, based on counsel's representations, that the appeal had become infructuous. The primary issue addressed was whether the appeal should continue or be dismissed. The Court concluded that the case was no longer viable and ordered dismissal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J The learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the present writ appeal has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top