Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
DAMODARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 33316 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 33384 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUNIL KUMAR (PALAKKAD), SMT.P.V.SARITHA VENUGOPAL, SMT.LEKSHMI S.SEKHER, SRI.B.JITHU, SMT.FEMY M.ANTONY
For the Respondents: SRI.MANU GOVIND, SHRI.A.JAYASANKAR, G.P - RIYAL DEVASSY

The court acknowledges and accepts the withdrawal of writ petitions as requested by the petitioners.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the permission sought by the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions (WP

(C) Nos. 33316 of 2022 and 33384 of 2022), acknowledging the request and dismissing the petitions as withdrawn. The examination revealed no objection from the respondents, leading to the court's acceptance of the withdrawal. The final outcome stated, 'the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.'

JUDGMENT

Petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petitions. Accordingly the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JDAMODARAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 33316 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 33384 OF 2022

The court acknowledges and accepts the withdrawal of writ petitions as requested by the petitioners.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
DAMODARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 33316 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 33384 OF 2022