IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
YANAMALA SWETHA CHANDRIKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-
arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.891/2024 of Erumapetty Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 468 , 420 and 406 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the de facto complainant, who runs AARSON INSPIRON Private Limited as an education consultant, was approached by the applicant and accused No. 1, who were conducting FLY ABROAD SOLUTIONS in Andhra Pradesh, with a promise to arrange U.K. job visas. Based on their assurance, the de facto complainant collected money from job seekers and transferred Rs. 2,24,05,000/- to the applicant and accused No. 1. Later, it was revealed that the promise was false and that they had cheated the de facto complainant and other job aspirants. Consequently, the de facto complainant had to sell his property to repay Rs. 1,15,88,500/-. Thus, it is alleged that the applicant and accused No. 1 committed fraud and wrongfully gained Rs. 2,24,05,000/-.
4. I have heard Sri.V.A.Hakeem, the learned counsel for the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.