IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M.M SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be in absolute ownership and possession of the properties, 16 Ares 19 Sq. Mts. and 20 Ares and 42 Sq. Mts. comprising in Re-sy Block No.14, Re-Sy. No.257/5-2 and 257/8 respectively in Pallivasal Village, Devikulam Taluk in the Revenue District of Idukki, as per Exts.P1 and P2 deeds. It is submitted that both properties are presently separated by a boundary wall constructed by the KSEB.
2. Being aggrieved by the drawing of a High Voltage Electric Line of 33 KV by the Board, the petitioner moved the District Collector with a request to shift the 33 KV Electric Distribution Line outside the property of the petitioner, through Ext.P3 petition, invoking Rule 3 of the Works of Licensees Rules framed under the Electricity Act , 2003.
3. The petitioner complains that Ext.P4 intimation was given by the first respondent without affording an opportunity of hearing and without supplying a copy of the report obtained pursuant to his application. The said contention is not disputed by the respondents by filing a counter-affidavit.
4. Under such circumstances, I am inclined to quash Ext.P4 and direct the first respondent to reconsider Ext.P3 with notice to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.