Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11870

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
PRAJEESH – Appellant
Versus
VIDYARDHADAYINI SABHA – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2735 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AKSHAY JOSEPH ADHIKARAM, SMT.D.JAYASREE(KUTHIATHODE), SRI.P.ROHIT PREMANANDAN SHENOY, SHRI.MITHUN C THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

Withdrawal of a civil appeal as per procedural norms.

Headnote:The petitioners sought to withdraw their appeal as indicated by their counsel. The court noted that a memo to that effect was filed and accordingly dismissed the original petition as not pressed. The ruling represents adherence to procedural norms in civil appeals surrounding withdrawal.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are not intending to prosecute the matter any further.

A memo has also been filed to that effect.

The original petition is hence dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 11870

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JPRAJEESH – AppellantVersusVIDYARDHADAYINI SABHA – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2735 OF 2023

Withdrawal of a civil appeal as per procedural norms.

Headnote:The petitioners sought to withdraw their appeal as indicated by their counsel. The court noted that a memo to that effect was filed and accordingly dismissed the original petition as not pressed. The ruling represents adherence to procedural norms in civil appeals surrounding withdrawal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
PRAJEESH – Appellant
Versus
VIDYARDHADAYINI SABHA – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2735 OF 2023