IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
K.A PIUS (SREENI) – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for appeal status consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. court finds further orders unnecessary given stay conditions. (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
This writ petition submitted by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider the advance memo filed in Ext. P1 appeal and dispose the same within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to not to proceed further till the 1st respondent disposes the Ext. P1 appeal.
iii. Pass such any other direction, order or reliefs, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience
2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, it is reported that the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has already considered stay petition submitted along with Ext.P1 appeal and a conditional order, staying the execution of the order passed by the District Commission in C.C No.209/2018, is passed. In the light of the above, further orders in this writ petition are not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.