Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ASHLA ROY – Appellant
Versus
KOLLAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court analyzes the requests made in the writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court concludes that unauthorized constructions are regularized, thus the petition is disposed. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent not to regularise the unauthorised constructions carried out by 3rd and 4th respondents in Block 38, Re Sy No. 77/1 and 77/2 of Kollam East Village.
ii. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to take into consideration Ext.P.7. and Ext.P.8. representations after affording an opportunity for personal hearing to the petitioner before passing orders on the application, if any, filed by the 3rd and 4th respondents for regularisation of unauthorised constructions carried out in Block 38, Re Sy No. 77/1 and 77/2 of Kollam East Village.
iii. To issue such other writs or pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court deems fit in the interests of justice. (SIC)
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration on
18.01.2023, this Court passed the follo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
