Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Easwaran S., J
M/s. Munnar Villa Vista Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant challenges the attachment order under pmla. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the attachment and trial. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
The appellant is aggrieved by the order of attachment ordered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 passed on 07.01.2023. After recording the reasons, the adjudicating authority confirmed the said order on 30.06.2023. As provided under the Act, on 15.02.2023, the appellant filed a statutory appeal before the appellate tribunal, and the order of the adjudicating authority was confirmed by the Tribunal and the appeal was dismissed. Hence, the present appeal under Section 42 of the Act.
2. Heard Sri. Renjith B. Marar, the learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri. Jaishankar V. Nair, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. Sri. Renjith B. Marar, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, pointed out that there was no necessity in the facts and circumstances of the case for ordering the revision of provisional order as confirmed by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal did not consider the case on merits. Alternative
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
