SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12129

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
GIREESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.AJEESH M UMMER
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 1566 OF 2026 -----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the 1st accused in CC No.800/2023 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class- III, Perumbavoor, which has been registered for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 420 and

120(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Crl.M.C. that he is settled in China. He was totally unaware of the pendency of the crime. It is only when the petitioner approached the Indian Mission in China to renew his passport that he came to learn about the pendency of the above case. He has also learnt that there is a look out circular (LOC) issued against him in connection with a crime. The petitioner is ready to come down to India and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that, his application may not be considered on the date of surrender and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

On

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top