SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SANEESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6346 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.ANAS MUHAMMED, SRI.C.C.ANOOP, SHRI.THAREEK T.S., SHRI.SALEEK.C.A., SHRI.HAMDAN MANSOOR K.
For the Respondents: PP.SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

The court allows withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous case while preserving the petitioner's rights to raise contentions before the trial court.

Headnote:In this case under the NDPS Act, the petitioner sought to withdraw a Criminal Miscellaneous Case. The court allowed the withdrawal while preserving the petitioner's rights to raise all contentions before the Trial Court. The court found the request justifiable. The outcome was a dismissal of the application, reserving rights for future contention.

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdraw this Crl.M.C, but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Trial Court. I find the said submission to be reasonable and justifiable. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Trial Court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top