Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
PRAKASH R AGED 47 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO.3370 OF 2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of representation in court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal for lack of prosecution. (Para 3) |
G. GIRISH, J.
---------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.3370 of 2020 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026
ORDER
No representation from the petitioner.
2. On 19.01.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had already relinquished the vakalat for the petitioner. Accordingly, notice was issued to the petitioner intimating the adjournment of the case to this day and also informing him that, if there is no representation the case would be decided in his absence. The aforesaid notice has been returned with the endorsement ‘not known’.
3. Today also, when the matter is taken up for consideration, there is no representation from the part of the petitioner.
In the above circumstances, the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
G. GIRISH JUDGE
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
