SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKKIM, J
PRADEEPAN V – Appellant
Versus
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAJU JOSEPH (SR.), SHRI.GEORGE KUTTY MATHEW, SRI.C.JOSEPH ANTONY.C
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, SRI.K.S.ANIL, SRI.ARUN BOSE, SRI.B.BIPIN, SRI.R.REJI, SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC, SRI.M.V.THAMBAN, SMT.THARA THAMBAN

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of the judgment in WP(C) No. 31525 of 2015 and the consequential orders passed by the 1st respondent, the petitioner does not have any grievance in the matter.

2. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top