SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HABEEB CHEDAKUTH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2020 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.NAJAH EBRAHIM V.P., SHRI.MOHAMMED SHIBILI C., SHRI.MUHAMMAD SABITH
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The court affirmed that timely issuance of government documents upon request is essential for upholding administrative justice.

Headnote:The writ petition concerns the issuance of a passport. Key provisions relating to the right to travel were cited. The petitioner requested orders for the issuance of a passport after representation to the authorities. The court found the petitioner's representation to be legitimate and directed a response within two weeks. The main issue is the timely issuance of documents. The court concluded that the third respondent must address the representation promptly, affirming procedural fairness in administrative matters.

Table of Content
1. issuance of a passport sought through representation. (Para 1)
2. court stresses a response must be given to representations. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the 3rd and 4th Respondents to consider Ext.P5 representation submitted at the Kozhikode Regional Passport Office and to issue the passport within a time frame fixed by this Honourable Court.

ii) Issue a direction to the 4th Respondent to return the original documents of the Petitioner if they are not required for further legal proceedings.

iii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly dispense with the filing of a translation of vernacular documents..

iv) Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. The petitioner sought a re-issuance of a passport for which Ext.P7 representation was made. The learned DSGI on instructions submits that the petitioner has been heard and orders are awaited. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P7 representation within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top