N.PRAKASH KUMAR vs SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12148

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
N.PRAKASH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.LAVARAJ M.G.
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU, GP

JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks a direction to consider Ext.P6 objection, which he has preferred against the conveying for revision of timings of the stage carriage of the 2^nd respondent. The petitioner contends that this is the 4^th time the 2^nd respondent has applied for the revision of timings, and therefore, the request should not have been entertained. The petitioner has already filed Ext.P6 objection against the proposal.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the 1^st respondent to consider Ext.P6 objection preferred by the petitioner herein as well, while considering the request made by the 2^nd respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document