Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
CHITRANGADAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22202 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: RAJ CAROLIN V.
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

Petitioners can withdraw their writ petitions without prejudice, preserving their rights to initiate future proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the withdrawal of a writ petition under WP

(C) NO. 22202 OF 2022. The law allows petitioners to withdraw without prejudice to filing anew. The court permitted the withdrawal, resulting in dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, thus maintaining the petitioner's rights for future action. The final verdict noted that permission was granted for withdrawal.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to file a fresh one.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JCHITRANGADAN – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 22202 OF 2022

Petitioners can withdraw their writ petitions without prejudice, preserving their rights to initiate future proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
CHITRANGADAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22202 OF 2022