Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY

The court holds that when a petition's prayers become infructuous, it may be closed as such, reflecting the case's procedural aspect rather than substantive merits.

Headnote:This judgment discusses the procedural outcome of Writ Petition (Civil) No. 27612 of 2024, where the appellant submits that the petitions' prayers are infructuous, leading the court to close the writ petition. The court records this submission and reaches a determination based on the information presented by the counsel. Ultimately, it rules that the writ petition is closed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous.

This is recorded.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :