IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SREEKUMARY.P.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
[WA Nos.244/2026, 173/2026, 196/2026] Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Regard being had to the similitude of the matters, these Writ Appeals have been heard analogously and are decided by a common judgment.
2. The present intra-court appeals under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, assail the judgment dated 10.12.2025 passed in W.P.(C) Nos. 28807 of 2022, 3009 of 2023 and 2999 of 2023 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition.
3. The appellants had approached this Court in writ petition claiming regularization of similarly situated persons. As per Exhibit R3(c) the claim of the appellants seeking regularization has already been rejected, in fact in the 2nd proposal for regularization only 114 posts were sanctioned wherein the appellants were not included in the aforesaid of 114 candidates.
3.1. The learned Single Judge relying on the judgment of this Court in Vishnu S. v. State of Kerala (W.P.(C) No. 5487 of 2021)
dated 10.11.2025 had dismissed the writ petition, with the observation that the parties will be governed by the directions in the judgment in Vishnu S. (Supra).
4. As per paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit filed by the C-DIT,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.