Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SREEKUMARY.P.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of regularization claims due to absence of sanctioned posts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. no sanctioned posts available for regularization. (Para 4) |
| 3. writ appeals permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to seek other remedies. (Para 5) |
J U D G M E N T
[WA Nos.244/2026, 173/2026, 196/2026] Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Regard being had to the similitude of the matters, these Writ Appeals have been heard analogously and are decided by a common judgment.
2. The present intra-court appeals under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, assail the judgment dated 10.12.2025 passed in W.P.(C) Nos. 28807 of 2022, 3009 of 2023 and 2999 of 2023 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition.
3. The appellants had approached this Court in writ petition claiming regularization of similarly situated persons. As per Exhibit R3(c) the claim of the appellants seeking regularization has already been rejected, in fact in the 2nd proposal for regularization only 114 posts were sanctioned wherein the appellants were not included in the aforesaid of 114 candidates.
3.1. The learned Single Judge relying on the judgment of this Court in Vishnu S. v. State of Kerala (W.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
