Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
PUSHPA THAMBI – Appellant
Versus
VANDHANA.P.P – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's challenge to the decree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of the petitioner's claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evidence analysis and credibility. (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. court's agreement with lower court findings. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. finality of the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J This appeal has been filed by the appellant/2nd respondent in O.P.No.108/2019 of Family Court, Kannur, challenging the judgment and decree for return of gold ornaments and money passed against her.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to by their rank in the Original Petition.
3. The averments made in the OP in brief are as follows:
4. Petitioner is the wife of 1st respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 28.09.2008 in accordance with Hindu religious rites. 2nd respondent is the mother of 1st respondent. In the said wedlock, a child was born to them. At the time of marriage, petitioner was given 55 sovereigns of gold ornaments by her parents. After two days of the marriage, except for five sovereigns of gold ornaments used for her normal wear, she entrusted all her gold ornaments with the 2nd respondent/mother-in-law. After the mar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
