Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12191
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SUNILKUMAR K.S. – Appellant
Versus
K.SUBRAMANIYAN – Respondent
RFA NO. 959 OF 2012|OS NO.837 OF 2009
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.A.AUGUSTINE, P.MURALEEDHARAN
For the Respondents: P.K.SAJEEV, R.RAJITHA, SANATHOSH P.PODUVAL
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.A.AUGUSTINE, P.MURALEEDHARAN
For the Respondents: P.K.SAJEEV, R.RAJITHA, SANATHOSH P.PODUVAL
A dismissal for non-prosecution may occur if a party fails to be present during hearings, emphasizing procedural compliance in appeals.
Headnote:The present appeal was filed under the Regular First Appeal against the judgment and decree in OS No. 837 of 2009. The appellants were absent during the hearing. Thus, the court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. Key issues discussed included the absence of the appellants at crucial hearings. The ruling confirms dismissal of the case due to lack of representation by the appellants as stated in paragraph 2.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. absence of the appellants leads to dismissing the appeal. (Para 1) |
| 2. final ruling is dismissal for non-prosecution. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellants today.
2. There was no representation for the appellants on 05/02/2026 as well.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB
